Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Australian Consumer Network - Craig Hill

In recent weeks, I have received several calls from persons claiming to be from my bank. They have told me that I have an account with them that is overdrawn. They have then gone on to instructt me, "for identification purposes", to verify my account number, by telling them over the phone. This is exactly what scammers who commit identity fraud do.

When I expressed my concern over their identity, these people become extremely aggressive. They refuse to give me their full name, the location they are calling from, a return number I can call them on, their supervisor's name, or any other details that might assist in identifying they are genuine. They also refused to tell me which bank account is overdrawn. They simply insist that I give out personal details, including home address, phone number and bank account details, on an unsecured and unsubstantiated phone line.


When I have refused, they have made threats that they will damage my credit rating if I don't divulge the personal information they demand. This is very intimidating.

I checked my bank accounts, and found they were all in order. So I called the bank, and tod them that maybe someone was trying to get information illegally. After about a 30 minute wait, the bank came back to me, and informed me that an account I had closed five years previously had not actually closed, and had accrued several hundred dollars of fees in that time. That was the debt they .had called me about.

Then the bank stated they were very disappointed that I had been so uncooperative with the person who had been unable to positively verify that they did actually work for the bank. Because I had been uncooperative, they had referred the matter to a collection agency, and recorded a bad debt on my otherwise unblemished credit rating.


Now, the bank has my mailing address, fax number, and email address, all securely recorded in my account details, along with my account number. Contacting me by any of these means allows me to see where the communication originated from. When I receive a call on my cell phone, I cannot even see what number the call has originated from, as the bank blocks this.

The ACCC, and Scam Watch, advise people not to give out such details over the phone, or even on the internet, if the email address is not known. Yet he banks insist on using these methods.

Surely there are more secure ways that the banks, and other organisations, could go about dealing with such matters.
60
Vote
Shared on
   


Funding - not Bribery

February 6th 2007 00:10
The Sydney Morning Herald has recently published what I consider to be one of the most outrageous pieces of left wing diatribe masquerading as news I have ever seen.

The headline is "Bribes offered to scientists" . From that headline and from the definition of 'bribe' vis "Money, property, or a favor given, offered, or promised to a person or accepted by a person in a position of trust as an inducement to dishonest behavior" we would be forgiven for believing that someone has done something illegal here.

But no, if we read further into the article we discover that the conservative American think tank, AEI, is offering funding to scientists who wish to contribute to the climate change debate with evidence which runs counter to the current hysteria which is sweeping the world faster that an El Nino windstorm.

So the AEI is offering to fund genuine scientific work by reputable scientists which supports a view which just happens to be out of favour at the moment. There's nothing unethical or underhand about that.

According to the lefties at the SMH, giving money to science which supports the doomsday climate change model is 'funding'. Giving money to anyone who disagrees which that model is 'bribery'!

The SMH article describes AEI as "ExxonMobil-funded think tank". That's just plain misleading. The AEI attracted an income of $US39 million in 2005 (the latest figures available on their website) The SMH article claims that AEI has received 1.6 million from Exxon Mobil. It doesn't say over what time period. By any reasonable standard it's misleading to claim that the AEI is ExxonMobil-funded.

The SMH article implies that AEI is working for ExxonMobil and bribing scientists to write misleading articles which deny climate change. This implication is false and misleading in the extreme.
53
Vote
Shared on
   


The case of Stefan Nystrom

January 8th 2007 02:17
The case of Stefan Nystrom and his deportation from Australia raises the issue of who is responsible for criminal behavior. One line of argument being put forward by various lawyers opposing his deportation is that since he's lived all but a few days of his life in Australia and has been "criminalized" there, Australia is somehow responsible for his behavior and should therefore grant to him all the privileges of Australian citizenship.

What ever to personal responsibility? Surely Nystrom is responsible for his criminal behavior and the Australian government is obliged to do everything it can to protect Australian citizens from criminals. Nystrom's crimes including the aggravated rape of a 10-year old boy were very serious and the government is right to minimize criminal activity in the country. I agree that Sweden is unfortunate to be burdened with a character such as Vystrom but ones nationality is initially defined by one's country of birth and there's not getting around that.
76
Vote
Shared on
   


When I was a child growing up in New Zealand I read an intriguing story about a while farmer who moved into a predominantly Maori community. At hay making time he was surprised when his neighbors turned up uninvited to help him get his hay in before the approaching rains arrived and ruined the crop. He offered to pay them for their efforts and they were offended by this gesture. They explained that it was the obvious thing to do and that they would expect him to do the same for them in similar circumstances.

This story stuck in my mind ever since. My father built his first house with his own hands and with the help of a carpenter friend. They spend every evening and every weekend for two years building the house (as well as raising a family, working full time and attending technical college in the evenings) and the did the same for another two years while they built the friend's house. There was no thought of asking each other for payment, simply an unspoken agreement that they would help each other as and when needed and that two people working together are more efficient than two working apart.

Throughout my childhood I bonded with my family through work. We build retaining walls, stripped wall paper, painted boats, chopped wood, stripped paint and renovated our batch (Kiwi slang for "holiday house"). On one memorable weekend I laid concrete all day Saturday, went to a school formal that night, stayed up all night partying, went sailing all day Sunday only to return home exhausted at 10pm Sunday evening to be greeted by my father with the news that I was just in time to help him put a coat of paint on the boat before bed. I crashed into the sack as midnight and was up the next day at six to start my new holiday job. It took me a week to get over it.

The benefits of working together as a family were numerous. I came to respect my mother and father for their ingenuity, perseverance, skill and diligence. I learned many skills from them and respected them for their achievements.

Later in life I would readily help friends with their work when needed and always refused payment. Even now when people suggest they pay me for some non professional service rendered I reply that no payment in necessary but that a dinner invitation would be a mutually agreeable means to appease their sense of gratitude.
73
Vote
   


MATURE CONTENT
   


CraigH's Blogs

556 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
10 Post(s)
895 Vote(s)
5 Comment(s)
30 Post(s)
795 Vote(s)
27 Comment(s)
11 Post(s)
Moderated by CraigH
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]